Mg Ke-
|
Subcapaian Pembelajaran
(Kemampuan Akhir)
|
Materi Pembelajaran
|
Metode Pembelajaran
|
Pengalaman Belajar
|
Penilaian
|
Waktu
|
Pustaka
|
|||||||
Indikator
|
Bentuk
|
Bobot (%)
|
||||||||||||
1
|
Class
Orientation & Introduction to Syllabus
|
Collaborative
|
discussion,
and assignment
|
7.1
%
|
2
x 100 minutes
|
Syllabus
|
||||||||
2
|
The students are expected to
obtain sufficient understanding on the concepts and practices of
Sociolinguistics
|
Introduction
to Sociolinguistics
|
Collaborative
|
1. The students know
the theory of Sociolinguistic
2. The students
understand the concept of sociolinguistic
|
1. Introduction to Sociolinguistics
2. How sociolinguistic happened
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1
%
|
2
x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 132-133
|
|||||
3
|
Linguistic
Varieties and Multilingual Nations:
|
Linguistic
Varieties and Multilingual Nations: vernacular languages, lingua
fracas, Pidgins, Creoles, and Jargon
|
Collaborative
|
1. Analyzing all the
concepts or theories discussed Linguistic Varieties and Multilingual
Nations
2. Presenting their
comprehension on the concepts or theories in group and class presentation and
discussion
|
3. To understand
vernacular
4. To understand
languages,
5. To understand
lingua fracas,
6. Pidgins,
Creoles,
7. and Jargon
|
Questions and answers given by students to the class
discussion
|
7.1
%
|
2
x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 133-135
|
|||||
4
|
Putting relevant concepts or
theories for solving case studies or problems in Sociolinguistics
|
Language
Communities, Multilingualism,
Interference, Code-Choice, Language Communities,
Multilingualism, Interference,
Code-Choice, Code-Switching, and Code-Mixing, Regional
and Social Dialects, Regional, Variation,
Social Variation, and Social Dialects
|
Collaborative
|
The
students could Putting relevant concepts or theories for solving case studies
or problems in Sociolinguistics
|
The
students able to understand and explain:
1. Multi Language
Communities,
2. Multilingualism
3. Interference,
4. Code-Choice,
5. Language
Communities,
6. Multilingualism,
7. Interference,
8. Code-Choice,
9. Code-Switching, and
Code-Mixing,
|
Questions and answers given by students to the class
discussion
|
7.1
%
|
2
x 100 minutes
|
Aronoff &
Fudeman (2005) pp. 149-170
|
|||||
5
|
Regional
and Social Variation
|
Regional
and Social Dialects, Regional, Variation,
Social Variation, and Social Dialects
|
Collaborative
|
The
students could selecting and using the concepts or theories for answering
analytical questions in Regional and Social Variation
|
1. Regional
and Social
2. Dialects,
3. Regional,
Variation, Social
4. Variation, and
Social Dialects
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1
%
|
2
x 100 minutes
|
Aronoff &
Fudeman (2005) pp.103-125
|
|||||
6
|
Regional
and Social Variation
|
Style,
Context, and Register
|
Collaborative
|
The
students could selecting and using the concepts or theories for answering
analytical questions in Regional and Social Variation
|
The
students understand sociolinguistic aspect by
1. Style,
2. Context, and
3. Register
|
Presentation, discussion, and
assignment
|
7.1 %
|
2 x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 135-138
|
|||||
7
|
Mid
Test
|
|||||||||||||
8
|
Language and Sex
|
Language
and Sex: Woman’s and Man’s, Language, Interaction,
Sexist Language
|
Collaborative
|
Analyzing
all the concepts or theories discussed about Language
and Sex
|
The
students understand about language and sex
1. Woman’s
and Man’s,
2. Language,
Interaction,
3. Sexist Language
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1 %
|
2 x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 135-138
|
|||||
9
|
Language
Change
|
Language
and Change
|
Collaborative
|
Analyzing
all the concepts or theories discussed about Language Change
|
The
students understand about Language and Change
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1 %
|
2 x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 135-138
|
|||||
10
|
Solidarity
and politeness
|
1. Tu and Vous
2. Address terms
3. Politeness
|
Collaborative
|
Putting
relevant concepts or theories for solving case studies or problems in
Sociolinguistics in Solidarity and politeness
|
The
students understand Solidarity and politeness
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1 %
|
2 x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 135-138
|
|||||
11
|
Acting
and Conversing
|
1. Speech acts: Austin
and Searle
2. Cooperation and
face : grice and goffman
3. Some features of
conversation
|
Collaborative
|
Putting
relevant concepts or theories for solving case studies or problems in
Sociolinguistics in Acting and Conversing
|
The
students understand about
1. Speech acts: Austin
and Searle
2. Cooperation and
face : grice and goffman
3. Some features of
conversation
|
Presentation,
discussion, and assignment
|
7.1 %
|
2 x 100 minutes
|
O’Grady et al. (1996) pp. 135-138
|
|||||
12
|
FINAL
TEST
|
|||||||||||||
Penetapan Nilai Akhir:
NA = Total bobot nilai per subcapaian
pembelajaran mata kuliah = 100.
|
||||||||||||||
Daftar Pustaka:
|
||||||||||||||
A.
|
RONDALD
WADHAUGH FIFTH EDITION “INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLINGUISTIC”
|
|||||||||||||
B.
|
RONDALD
WADHAUGH AND JANET M. FULER “ INTRODUCTION TO SOSIOLINGUISTIC”
|
|||||||||||||
Selasa, 03 Maret 2020
SYLLABUS SOCIOLINGUISTIC 2020
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
If you have question, please written in comment column